<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 565 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303096</link>
    <description>Section 160(1) CrPC permits a police officer to summon a person only when that person appears, from information received or otherwise, to be acquainted with the facts and circumstances under investigation; a bare or convenience-based summons is outside the provision. The commentary also notes that repeated summons to a person not shown to be a relevant witness, and prosecution under Section 188 IPC for non-compliance with such summons, are unlawful where the statutory conditions are absent. The stated result is that the notices and consequential proceedings were quashed and the police were restrained from summoning the person unless Section 160 conditions are satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 13:24:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 565 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303096</link>
      <description>Section 160(1) CrPC permits a police officer to summon a person only when that person appears, from information received or otherwise, to be acquainted with the facts and circumstances under investigation; a bare or convenience-based summons is outside the provision. The commentary also notes that repeated summons to a person not shown to be a relevant witness, and prosecution under Section 188 IPC for non-compliance with such summons, are unlawful where the statutory conditions are absent. The stated result is that the notices and consequential proceedings were quashed and the police were restrained from summoning the person unless Section 160 conditions are satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>