https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303093 Where plaintiffs, as strangers to a sale deed, seek a declaration that the alienation is null and void and not binding, the suit is valued under Section 25(d) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, not under Section 40, which applies to cancellation by parties to the document. Court fee is primarily gathered from the plaint averments, and a defendant's version alone cannot justify rejection of the plaint where no clear bar is disclosed. The suit was therefore correctly valued, and no ground existed to reject or return the plaint under Order 7 Rule 10 or Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. en-us Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jul 2022 10:08:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303093 Where plaintiffs, as strangers to a sale deed, seek a declaration that the alienation is null and void and not binding, the suit is valued under Section 25(d) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, not under Section 40, which applies to cancellation by parties to the document. Court fee is primarily gathered from the plaint averments, and a defendant's version alone cannot justify rejection of the plaint where no clear bar is disclosed. The suit was therefore correctly valued, and no ground existed to reject or return the plaint under Order 7 Rule 10 or Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303093