https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424577 Fraudulent input tax credit allegations under the goods and services tax law did not justify continued custody once investigation was complete and the complaint had been filed. The Court treated the case as a request for regular bail and applied settled bail factors, including the seriousness of the charge, stage of trial, documentary nature of the evidence, custody since arrest, absence of antecedents, and the risk of absconding. It held that economic offence allegations do not automatically bar bail, and granted release on conditions because further detention was not necessary to secure the applicant's presence at trial. en-us Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 12:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424577 Fraudulent input tax credit allegations under the goods and services tax law did not justify continued custody once investigation was complete and the complaint had been filed. The Court treated the case as a request for regular bail and applied settled bail factors, including the seriousness of the charge, stage of trial, documentary nature of the evidence, custody since arrest, absence of antecedents, and the risk of absconding. It held that economic offence allegations do not automatically bar bail, and granted release on conditions because further detention was not necessary to secure the applicant's presence at trial. Case-Laws GST Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424577