https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424571 The HC granted regular bail to the applicant charged under Sections 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), and 132(1)(k) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Despite the case involving claims of Rs. 217 crores, the court considered the completed investigation, applicant's custody period, bail granted to co-accused, maximum sentence applicable, and applicant's willingness to deposit a significant sum. Following the Sanjay Chandra precedent, bail was granted with conditions including executing a personal bond, surrendering passport, restricted movement, monthly police reporting, periodic deposits, and non-interference with the investigation. en-us Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 15:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424571 The HC granted regular bail to the applicant charged under Sections 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), and 132(1)(k) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Despite the case involving claims of Rs. 217 crores, the court considered the completed investigation, applicant's custody period, bail granted to co-accused, maximum sentence applicable, and applicant's willingness to deposit a significant sum. Following the Sanjay Chandra precedent, bail was granted with conditions including executing a personal bond, surrendering passport, restricted movement, monthly police reporting, periodic deposits, and non-interference with the investigation. Case-Laws GST Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424571