<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 121 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation for AY 2000-01 and 2001-02. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s order, as it was in line with the precedent set by the Jurisdictional High Court. The lack of contradictory decisions from higher authorities further supported the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 09:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 121 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation for AY 2000-01 and 2001-02. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s order, as it was in line with the precedent set by the Jurisdictional High Court. The lack of contradictory decisions from higher authorities further supported the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>