<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 114 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424559</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the excess depreciation claim was made in good faith and reversed voluntarily by the assessee before any detection by the Revenue. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty and allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 09:08:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 114 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424559</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the excess depreciation claim was made in good faith and reversed voluntarily by the assessee before any detection by the Revenue. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty and allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>