<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 109 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to the provident fund for the assessment year 2018-19. The decision emphasized that the contribution was made within the extended due date as per provident fund laws, rendering the disallowance by the Central Processing Centre incorrect. The judgment underscored the necessity of complying with prescribed due dates and ensuring adjustments align with legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 09:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 109 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to the provident fund for the assessment year 2018-19. The decision emphasized that the contribution was made within the extended due date as per provident fund laws, rendering the disallowance by the Central Processing Centre incorrect. The judgment underscored the necessity of complying with prescribed due dates and ensuring adjustments align with legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>