<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 108 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424553</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) against the assessee for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income by claiming a bogus business loss without supporting evidence, despite the assessee&#039;s voluntary admission of the error during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal found that the surrender of income was not voluntary as it was prompted by detection by tax authorities, leading to the affirmation of the penalty imposed by the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 09:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 108 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424553</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) against the assessee for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income by claiming a bogus business loss without supporting evidence, despite the assessee&#039;s voluntary admission of the error during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal found that the surrender of income was not voluntary as it was prompted by detection by tax authorities, leading to the affirmation of the penalty imposed by the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>