https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424532 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, confirming the appellant's entitlement to Cenvat credit for services provided by dealers to customers for warranty obligations. The Tribunal emphasized that these services were integral to the appellant's promotional strategy and directly linked to the manufacture of final products, falling under the definition of 'input service.' Precedents cited supported the appellant's position, rejecting the argument that a post-amendment change impacted eligibility. The impugned order was set aside, affirming the appellant's right to claim Cenvat credit for the services in question. en-us Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jul 2022 09:06:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424532 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, confirming the appellant's entitlement to Cenvat credit for services provided by dealers to customers for warranty obligations. The Tribunal emphasized that these services were integral to the appellant's promotional strategy and directly linked to the manufacture of final products, falling under the definition of 'input service.' Precedents cited supported the appellant's position, rejecting the argument that a post-amendment change impacted eligibility. The impugned order was set aside, affirming the appellant's right to claim Cenvat credit for the services in question. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424532