<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1331 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303090</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court considered whether delay in filing the civil appeal should be condoned and whether notice should issue in a classification dispute involving an asserted cascading effect. Notice was issued on the condonation application and on the civil appeal, and the parties were directed to file counter affidavit and rejoinder before further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2022 19:46:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1331 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303090</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court considered whether delay in filing the civil appeal should be condoned and whether notice should issue in a classification dispute involving an asserted cascading effect. Notice was issued on the condonation application and on the civil appeal, and the parties were directed to file counter affidavit and rejoinder before further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>