<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 80 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424525</link>
    <description>The High Court refused to entertain Customs authorities&#039; impleadment petitions in cases involving seized unflavoured Supari consignments. Petitioners challenged the classification under Chapter-8, advocating for Chapter-21 classification as &quot;Food preparations.&quot; The Court emphasized the need for detailed examination, considering certificates from the Food Safety Authority. Provisional release under Section 110A was highlighted, stressing prompt decisions, especially for perishable goods. Petitioners were allowed to apply for release, with a timeline for classification determination. Compliance with Circular No.22/2004-Cus. was mandated for disputed consignments&#039; release, with the judgment disposing of writ petitions without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2022 19:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 80 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424525</link>
      <description>The High Court refused to entertain Customs authorities&#039; impleadment petitions in cases involving seized unflavoured Supari consignments. Petitioners challenged the classification under Chapter-8, advocating for Chapter-21 classification as &quot;Food preparations.&quot; The Court emphasized the need for detailed examination, considering certificates from the Food Safety Authority. Provisional release under Section 110A was highlighted, stressing prompt decisions, especially for perishable goods. Petitioners were allowed to apply for release, with a timeline for classification determination. Compliance with Circular No.22/2004-Cus. was mandated for disputed consignments&#039; release, with the judgment disposing of writ petitions without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>