<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 78 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424523</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) and directed the Assessing Officer to cancel the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed based on the legal issue of the penalty notice&#039;s invalidity due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the charge, rendering the penalty proceedings invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2022 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 78 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424523</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) and directed the Assessing Officer to cancel the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed based on the legal issue of the penalty notice&#039;s invalidity due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the charge, rendering the penalty proceedings invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>