<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1341 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303076</link>
    <description>In a cheque dishonour prosecution, the accused was held entitled to seek forensic examination of the disputed cheque to test the age of the ink, because the document itself could support rebuttal of the statutory presumptions under negotiable instruments law. The court recognised that expert assistance is not limited to handwriting or signature comparison where the defence is that the cheque was issued blank and later filled in. Denying ink-age examination would restrict the accused&#039;s opportunity to adduce defence evidence and affect fair trial rights. Scientific ink analysis was treated as a feasible method, with any practical concerns to be managed by the expert and trial court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1341 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303076</link>
      <description>In a cheque dishonour prosecution, the accused was held entitled to seek forensic examination of the disputed cheque to test the age of the ink, because the document itself could support rebuttal of the statutory presumptions under negotiable instruments law. The court recognised that expert assistance is not limited to handwriting or signature comparison where the defence is that the cheque was issued blank and later filled in. Denying ink-age examination would restrict the accused&#039;s opportunity to adduce defence evidence and affect fair trial rights. Scientific ink analysis was treated as a feasible method, with any practical concerns to be managed by the expert and trial court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>