https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303075 The appellate court ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute over verandah possession, determining that the verandah was not part of the respondent's tenancy agreement. The court found that the respondent did not have possession of the verandah as claimed by the appellants. The court emphasized the importance of unequivocal admissions in establishing possession and upheld the lower court's decision regarding the tenancy agreement. The second appeal was allowed, granting a permanent injunction in favor of the appellants and dismissing the respondent's cross-objections. en-us Fri, 29 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jul 2022 11:39:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303075 The appellate court ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute over verandah possession, determining that the verandah was not part of the respondent's tenancy agreement. The court found that the respondent did not have possession of the verandah as claimed by the appellants. The court emphasized the importance of unequivocal admissions in establishing possession and upheld the lower court's decision regarding the tenancy agreement. The second appeal was allowed, granting a permanent injunction in favor of the appellants and dismissing the respondent's cross-objections. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303075