<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 65 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424510</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging assessment orders for the years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to comply with statutory requirements and dilatory tactics. The petitioner&#039;s lack of diligence in responding to notices and requests for additional time led to the dismissal. The court granted the petitioner the option to appeal before the Appellate Commissioner without imposing costs on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2022 09:12:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 65 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424510</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging assessment orders for the years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to comply with statutory requirements and dilatory tactics. The petitioner&#039;s lack of diligence in responding to notices and requests for additional time led to the dismissal. The court granted the petitioner the option to appeal before the Appellate Commissioner without imposing costs on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>