https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424492 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the Central Excise Authority cannot recover demand without proper service of the adjudication order as required by the Central Excise Act. It was deemed unlawful for the CGST authority to recover amounts exceeding the statutory pre-deposit for filing an appeal. The court also found the adjustment of a refund and attachment of the petitioner's bank account to be unjustified. The respondents were directed to refund the excess amount recovered, release the bank account attachment, and expedite the appeal process within three months. en-us Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jul 2022 09:11:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424492 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the Central Excise Authority cannot recover demand without proper service of the adjudication order as required by the Central Excise Act. It was deemed unlawful for the CGST authority to recover amounts exceeding the statutory pre-deposit for filing an appeal. The court also found the adjustment of a refund and attachment of the petitioner's bank account to be unjustified. The respondents were directed to refund the excess amount recovered, release the bank account attachment, and expedite the appeal process within three months. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424492