<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1668 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303064</link>
    <description>The Court granted the petitioner interim bail for three weeks under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, considering the mother&#039;s illness, the petitioner&#039;s cooperation with the Enforcement Directorate, and the charge sheet submission. The bail was subject to conditions like furnishing a bond, providing sureties, staying within NCR of Delhi, and surrendering the passport. Failure to comply could result in bail cancellation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 20:45:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1668 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303064</link>
      <description>The Court granted the petitioner interim bail for three weeks under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, considering the mother&#039;s illness, the petitioner&#039;s cooperation with the Enforcement Directorate, and the charge sheet submission. The bail was subject to conditions like furnishing a bond, providing sureties, staying within NCR of Delhi, and surrendering the passport. Failure to comply could result in bail cancellation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>