<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1585 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303058</link>
    <description>The Authority found that the Respondent had benefited from Input Tax Credit (ITC) but failed to pass on the benefit to homebuyers as required by Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The profiteered amount was determined to be Rs. 1,42,45,741/-. The Respondent&#039;s claim of passing on the benefit was not verified, and further verification was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1585 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303058</link>
      <description>The Authority found that the Respondent had benefited from Input Tax Credit (ITC) but failed to pass on the benefit to homebuyers as required by Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The profiteered amount was determined to be Rs. 1,42,45,741/-. The Respondent&#039;s claim of passing on the benefit was not verified, and further verification was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>