<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 35 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424480</link>
    <description>Permanent Lok Adalats must follow the staged procedure under Section 22-C of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, beginning with pleadings and mandatory conciliation before any decision on merits. The statutory scheme makes settlement the primary object, and even if a party is absent, the Permanent Lok Adalat must still attempt conciliation and formulate possible terms of settlement. Unlike ordinary Lok Adalats, Permanent Lok Adalats have a limited adjudicatory role conferred by statute: if conciliation fails, they may decide the dispute on merits, and their award is final and binding. The text also distinguishes Chapter VI-A from Chapter VI and confirms that adjudicatory power exists only after the prescribed conciliation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 35 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424480</link>
      <description>Permanent Lok Adalats must follow the staged procedure under Section 22-C of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, beginning with pleadings and mandatory conciliation before any decision on merits. The statutory scheme makes settlement the primary object, and even if a party is absent, the Permanent Lok Adalat must still attempt conciliation and formulate possible terms of settlement. Unlike ordinary Lok Adalats, Permanent Lok Adalats have a limited adjudicatory role conferred by statute: if conciliation fails, they may decide the dispute on merits, and their award is final and binding. The text also distinguishes Chapter VI-A from Chapter VI and confirms that adjudicatory power exists only after the prescribed conciliation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>