<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 33 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance under section 36(1)(viii) of the IT Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in the method for computing deductions and referred to previous rulings supporting the assessee&#039;s approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 11:14:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 33 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance under section 36(1)(viii) of the IT Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in the method for computing deductions and referred to previous rulings supporting the assessee&#039;s approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>