https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424471 A writ petition challenging GST detention and penalty orders was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The Court indicated that the petitioner should pursue the appellate remedy under the GST law, and, on the assurance that the seized goods were not perishable and would not be sold if an appeal was filed, it protected the seized goods and vehicle from disposal pending the appeal. en-us Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 12:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424471 A writ petition challenging GST detention and penalty orders was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The Court indicated that the petitioner should pursue the appellate remedy under the GST law, and, on the assurance that the seized goods were not perishable and would not be sold if an appeal was filed, it protected the seized goods and vehicle from disposal pending the appeal. Case-Laws GST Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424471