<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 20 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424465</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Rs. 40 Lakhs did not qualify as &quot;undisclosed income&quot; for the purpose of penalty under Section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the CIT(A) and directed the AO to delete the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 20 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424465</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Rs. 40 Lakhs did not qualify as &quot;undisclosed income&quot; for the purpose of penalty under Section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the CIT(A) and directed the AO to delete the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>