<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 16 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424461</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and remanded the case for a fresh adjudication order, emphasizing the importance of adherence to procedural requirements and principles of natural justice. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to provide adequate opportunities to the appellant as per the law. The Tribunal avoided making a decision on the merits to prevent bias, highlighting the significance of following prescribed procedures in adjudication proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:33:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 16 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424461</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and remanded the case for a fresh adjudication order, emphasizing the importance of adherence to procedural requirements and principles of natural justice. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to provide adequate opportunities to the appellant as per the law. The Tribunal avoided making a decision on the merits to prevent bias, highlighting the significance of following prescribed procedures in adjudication proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>