<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 12 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424457</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled that C&amp;amp;F Agent Services qualify as admissible input services under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant was found entitled to Cenvat Credit on such services as they were provided for the sale of goods on behalf of the appellant up to the place of removal. The Tribunal referenced a previous decision to support this conclusion, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:33:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 12 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424457</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled that C&amp;amp;F Agent Services qualify as admissible input services under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant was found entitled to Cenvat Credit on such services as they were provided for the sale of goods on behalf of the appellant up to the place of removal. The Tribunal referenced a previous decision to support this conclusion, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>