<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 8 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424453</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled that the appellant is not required to pay under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules for the clearance of &quot;Bagasse&quot; in the sugar manufacturing process. Citing legal precedents, including a Supreme Court judgment and an Allahabad High Court decision, the Tribunal found that Rule 6 does not apply to Bagasse generation. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, as the demand was deemed unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:33:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 8 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424453</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled that the appellant is not required to pay under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules for the clearance of &quot;Bagasse&quot; in the sugar manufacturing process. Citing legal precedents, including a Supreme Court judgment and an Allahabad High Court decision, the Tribunal found that Rule 6 does not apply to Bagasse generation. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, as the demand was deemed unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>