https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424450 An adjudicating order that omits consideration of a refund claim, despite an earlier direction to decide it in accordance with law, is legally deficient and liable to be quashed. The Court set aside the impugned orders because they did not address the refund issue and directed de novo consideration through a speaking order after due notice, personal hearing, and an opportunity to file written submissions and respond to relied-upon materials. The merits of the refund dispute were left open for the authority to decide afresh. en-us Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:32:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424450 An adjudicating order that omits consideration of a refund claim, despite an earlier direction to decide it in accordance with law, is legally deficient and liable to be quashed. The Court set aside the impugned orders because they did not address the refund issue and directed de novo consideration through a speaking order after due notice, personal hearing, and an opportunity to file written submissions and respond to relied-upon materials. The merits of the refund dispute were left open for the authority to decide afresh. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424450