<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 3 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424448</link>
    <description>In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act involving a dissolved partnership, the court held that partner liability under Section 141 must be tested from the complaint as a whole and on a fresh appraisal of the material, including whether the allegations show responsibility for the firm&#039;s business. It also held that the effect of dissolution and the absence of public notice under Sections 45 and 72 of the Partnership Act are questions of law that may be raised in appeal and can affect liability on a cheque issued after dissolution. The acquittal was set aside and the matter remanded for a fresh trial and evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 3 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424448</link>
      <description>In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act involving a dissolved partnership, the court held that partner liability under Section 141 must be tested from the complaint as a whole and on a fresh appraisal of the material, including whether the allegations show responsibility for the firm&#039;s business. It also held that the effect of dissolution and the absence of public notice under Sections 45 and 72 of the Partnership Act are questions of law that may be raised in appeal and can affect liability on a cheque issued after dissolution. The acquittal was set aside and the matter remanded for a fresh trial and evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>