https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303047 Writ petitions challenging assessment orders were held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal remedy was available. The assessment orders had been passed after notice and hearing, and the Court reiterated that in fiscal matters Article 226 jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an alternative appellate remedy exists. Alleged improper consideration of objections was treated as a factual grievance for the appellate authority, not as a violation of natural justice. The Court therefore declined to examine the merits and dismissed the writ petitions for availability of the alternate remedy. en-us Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:31:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303047 Writ petitions challenging assessment orders were held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal remedy was available. The assessment orders had been passed after notice and hearing, and the Court reiterated that in fiscal matters Article 226 jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an alternative appellate remedy exists. Alleged improper consideration of objections was treated as a factual grievance for the appellate authority, not as a violation of natural justice. The Court therefore declined to examine the merits and dismissed the writ petitions for availability of the alternate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303047