<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 760 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303037</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the charge sheet dated 9-2-1988 and subsequent letters were unsustainable due to the failure to complete the enquiry by the specified date, rendering the original charge sheet vitiated. Issuing a fresh charge sheet with identical charges was deemed impermissible, as the respondent lost the right to proceed after the specified date. Consequently, the court quashed the mentioned documents, ruling in favor of the petitioner without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:43:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 760 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303037</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the charge sheet dated 9-2-1988 and subsequent letters were unsustainable due to the failure to complete the enquiry by the specified date, rendering the original charge sheet vitiated. Issuing a fresh charge sheet with identical charges was deemed impermissible, as the respondent lost the right to proceed after the specified date. Consequently, the court quashed the mentioned documents, ruling in favor of the petitioner without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>