<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 594 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303036</link>
    <description>Dishonour of a cheque after the drawer closes the bank account still attracts liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The provision applies where a cheque is issued in discharge of a debt or liability, presented for payment, dishonoured, notice is served, and payment is not made within the statutory period; the precise reason for dishonour is not decisive. Closing the account before or after issuance does not take the case outside the statute, because such conduct falls within the mischief the provision is designed to prevent and preserves the credibility of cheque-based commercial transactions. The drawer remains liable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:41:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 594 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303036</link>
      <description>Dishonour of a cheque after the drawer closes the bank account still attracts liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The provision applies where a cheque is issued in discharge of a debt or liability, presented for payment, dishonoured, notice is served, and payment is not made within the statutory period; the precise reason for dishonour is not decisive. Closing the account before or after issuance does not take the case outside the statute, because such conduct falls within the mischief the provision is designed to prevent and preserves the credibility of cheque-based commercial transactions. The drawer remains liable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>