<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 537 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303034</link>
    <description>In a Section 138 NI Act prosecution, the appellate court may impose reasonable conditions while suspending sentence under Section 389 CrPC, including a requirement to deposit part of the compensation amount. The Court treated cheque dishonour liability as criminal liability arising by legal fiction, while recognising the complainant&#039;s entitlement to recovery within a reasonable time. Relying on prior authority approving deposit-linked suspension orders in cheque dishonour cases, it held that directing deposit of 25% of the compensation amount was lawful and not improper; the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:36:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 537 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303034</link>
      <description>In a Section 138 NI Act prosecution, the appellate court may impose reasonable conditions while suspending sentence under Section 389 CrPC, including a requirement to deposit part of the compensation amount. The Court treated cheque dishonour liability as criminal liability arising by legal fiction, while recognising the complainant&#039;s entitlement to recovery within a reasonable time. Relying on prior authority approving deposit-linked suspension orders in cheque dishonour cases, it held that directing deposit of 25% of the compensation amount was lawful and not improper; the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>