https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303033 The High Court held that the Government's decision to reopen disciplinary proceedings against a Civil Assistant Surgeon, despite the Tribunal's order setting aside the termination and directing reinstatement, was unauthorized and lacked jurisdiction. The Court directed the authorities to pay the petitioner's retirement benefits, monthly pension, and eligible leave salary within a specified timeframe, considering the retirement date. The Court emphasized the need to adhere to Tribunal orders and ensure actions are within the scope of jurisdiction for fairness and legality in administrative processes. en-us Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:32:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303033 The High Court held that the Government's decision to reopen disciplinary proceedings against a Civil Assistant Surgeon, despite the Tribunal's order setting aside the termination and directing reinstatement, was unauthorized and lacked jurisdiction. The Court directed the authorities to pay the petitioner's retirement benefits, monthly pension, and eligible leave salary within a specified timeframe, considering the retirement date. The Court emphasized the need to adhere to Tribunal orders and ensure actions are within the scope of jurisdiction for fairness and legality in administrative processes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303033