<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 771 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303030</link>
    <description>Disciplinary proceedings initiated before superannuation could not be used to withhold retirement where the enquiry remained unfinished despite repeated court directions and extensions. The respondents&#039; decision to place the employee under suspension and prevent retirement two days before superannuation was held contrary to earlier court orders and inconsistent with the governing instructions on retention beyond superannuation. The impugned order was also treated as having been passed beyond the scope of the contempt proceedings. The action to continue the proceedings in that manner was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 771 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303030</link>
      <description>Disciplinary proceedings initiated before superannuation could not be used to withhold retirement where the enquiry remained unfinished despite repeated court directions and extensions. The respondents&#039; decision to place the employee under suspension and prevent retirement two days before superannuation was held contrary to earlier court orders and inconsistent with the governing instructions on retention beyond superannuation. The impugned order was also treated as having been passed beyond the scope of the contempt proceedings. The action to continue the proceedings in that manner was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>