<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (1) TMI 19 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29359</link>
    <description>Amounts transferred under relinquishment deeds were treated as transactions supported by consideration, not voluntary gifts, because the documents showed they were executed to settle disputes and secure relinquishment of property rights. Since a gift requires transfer without consideration, the presence of settlement-based consideration negatived the character of a gift. On that basis, section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 did not arise for application on the facts found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:33:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (1) TMI 19 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29359</link>
      <description>Amounts transferred under relinquishment deeds were treated as transactions supported by consideration, not voluntary gifts, because the documents showed they were executed to settle disputes and secure relinquishment of property rights. Since a gift requires transfer without consideration, the presence of settlement-based consideration negatived the character of a gift. On that basis, section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 did not arise for application on the facts found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>