<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1266 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424425</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on most grounds, emphasizing consistency with earlier years&#039; rulings and the necessity of following established legal principles for benchmarking international transactions and determining expenditure nature. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with some issues remanded for further verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1266 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424425</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on most grounds, emphasizing consistency with earlier years&#039; rulings and the necessity of following established legal principles for benchmarking international transactions and determining expenditure nature. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with some issues remanded for further verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>