<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 60 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29356</link>
    <description>The court held that the perquisite value provided to a director could not exceed Rs. 4,200, the actual rent paid by the company. The assessment years 1963-64 to 1966-67 and 1967-68 to 1968-69 were decided in favor of the assessee, with the court ruling that the quantum of perquisite should not be increased to Rs. 12,500. The assessee was awarded costs, including counsel&#039;s fee of Rs. 500.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 60 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29356</link>
      <description>The court held that the perquisite value provided to a director could not exceed Rs. 4,200, the actual rent paid by the company. The assessment years 1963-64 to 1966-67 and 1967-68 to 1968-69 were decided in favor of the assessee, with the court ruling that the quantum of perquisite should not be increased to Rs. 12,500. The assessee was awarded costs, including counsel&#039;s fee of Rs. 500.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>