<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1259 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424418</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding that the allegations of clandestine removal and the penalties imposed were not supported by sufficient evidence. The appeals were allowed, and the confiscation of the alleged excess stock and the demands of duty were deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of tangible and corroborative evidence in cases of clandestine removal and the need for adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1259 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424418</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding that the allegations of clandestine removal and the penalties imposed were not supported by sufficient evidence. The appeals were allowed, and the confiscation of the alleged excess stock and the demands of duty were deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of tangible and corroborative evidence in cases of clandestine removal and the need for adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>