<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1366 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303023</link>
    <description>The Court refrained from expressing an opinion on the petitioner&#039;s claim for a waiver of demurrage, emphasizing the responsibility of the respondents to evaluate and decide on the matter. The Court directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation and make a decision within three weeks, without incurring any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 20:59:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1366 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303023</link>
      <description>The Court refrained from expressing an opinion on the petitioner&#039;s claim for a waiver of demurrage, emphasizing the responsibility of the respondents to evaluate and decide on the matter. The Court directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation and make a decision within three weeks, without incurring any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>