<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1968 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303025</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Appellate Court&#039;s judgment. The respondent was sentenced to one year of simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs.72 lakh, with Rs.71 lakh as compensation to the complainant. The respondent had four weeks to deposit the amount, failing which a non-bailable warrant would be issued for his arrest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 20:59:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1968 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303025</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Appellate Court&#039;s judgment. The respondent was sentenced to one year of simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs.72 lakh, with Rs.71 lakh as compensation to the complainant. The respondent had four weeks to deposit the amount, failing which a non-bailable warrant would be issued for his arrest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>