<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1994 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303024</link>
    <description>The court held that the civil suit filed by the respondents was barred by limitation as it was filed six years after the execution of the sale deed, exceeding the prescribed three-year period. Additionally, the respondents were directed to pay ad valorem court fees based on the valuation of the suit property. The revision petition was granted, and the suit was dismissed on the grounds of being time-barred and the incorrect payment of court fees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 20:59:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1994 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303024</link>
      <description>The court held that the civil suit filed by the respondents was barred by limitation as it was filed six years after the execution of the sale deed, exceeding the prescribed three-year period. Additionally, the respondents were directed to pay ad valorem court fees based on the valuation of the suit property. The revision petition was granted, and the suit was dismissed on the grounds of being time-barred and the incorrect payment of court fees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>