https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29353 The court dismissed the petitioners' claims for interest on compensation and emoluments, as well as for the cost of improvements on the property. It held that the I.T. Act does not provide for interest on compensation until after possession and that business cessation losses should be addressed in a proper forum, not under art. 226. The court emphasized that damages cannot be assessed under art. 226 and that the reliefs sought by the petitioners were not granted. en-us Wed, 13 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:21:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29353 The court dismissed the petitioners' claims for interest on compensation and emoluments, as well as for the cost of improvements on the property. It held that the I.T. Act does not provide for interest on compensation until after possession and that business cessation losses should be addressed in a proper forum, not under art. 226. The court emphasized that damages cannot be assessed under art. 226 and that the reliefs sought by the petitioners were not granted. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 13 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29353