https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303016 At the stage of cognizance in a criminal defamation complaint, the sworn verification under section 200 CrPC must contain a factual basis linking each accused to the alleged publication; where the complaint was not on oath and the verification did not refer to the applicants' role, process against them was unsustainable and liable to be quashed. The High Court further held that the bar on a second revision under section 397(3) CrPC did not exclude its inherent jurisdiction under section 482, so the objection based on prior revision failed. en-us Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:32:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303016 At the stage of cognizance in a criminal defamation complaint, the sworn verification under section 200 CrPC must contain a factual basis linking each accused to the alleged publication; where the complaint was not on oath and the verification did not refer to the applicants' role, process against them was unsustainable and liable to be quashed. The High Court further held that the bar on a second revision under section 397(3) CrPC did not exclude its inherent jurisdiction under section 482, so the objection based on prior revision failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303016