<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 822 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303015</link>
    <description>The court quashed the process orders issued by the Magistrate and the judgment by the Additional Sessions Judge. The case was remanded for the Magistrate to record the verification statement afresh in compliance with the law. The court directed the Registrar to circulate the judgment to all Metropolitan Magistrates in Mumbai for proper procedure under Section 200 of the Code. The petitions were partly allowed with no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:13:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 822 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303015</link>
      <description>The court quashed the process orders issued by the Magistrate and the judgment by the Additional Sessions Judge. The case was remanded for the Magistrate to record the verification statement afresh in compliance with the law. The court directed the Registrar to circulate the judgment to all Metropolitan Magistrates in Mumbai for proper procedure under Section 200 of the Code. The petitions were partly allowed with no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>