<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 83 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29351</link>
    <description>Remuneration paid by a partnership firm to a karta for managing the business and rendering personal services is not automatically taxable as income of the Hindu undivided family. The decisive test is whether the payment has a direct nexus with the family&#039;s investment in the firm or is, in substance, a return on joint family funds or made to the detriment of family assets. Where the salary is compensation for individual services, it belongs to the karta personally and is assessable in his individual hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:17:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 83 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29351</link>
      <description>Remuneration paid by a partnership firm to a karta for managing the business and rendering personal services is not automatically taxable as income of the Hindu undivided family. The decisive test is whether the payment has a direct nexus with the family&#039;s investment in the firm or is, in substance, a return on joint family funds or made to the detriment of family assets. Where the salary is compensation for individual services, it belongs to the karta personally and is assessable in his individual hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>