<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 82 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29350</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled that when a minor partner attains majority and continues in a firm with no change in the partnership deed, the firm&#039;s registration remains valid under sections 184(7) and 184(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that a minor admitted to partnership benefits is considered a partner. As the partnership deed indicated equal profit sharing among partners, including the minor post-majority, and no change in constitution or shares, the firm&#039;s registration was upheld. The court did not address the validity of canceling the assessment order without revoking the firm&#039;s registration renewal due to the favorable ruling for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:15:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 82 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29350</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled that when a minor partner attains majority and continues in a firm with no change in the partnership deed, the firm&#039;s registration remains valid under sections 184(7) and 184(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that a minor admitted to partnership benefits is considered a partner. As the partnership deed indicated equal profit sharing among partners, including the minor post-majority, and no change in constitution or shares, the firm&#039;s registration was upheld. The court did not address the validity of canceling the assessment order without revoking the firm&#039;s registration renewal due to the favorable ruling for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>