<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1246 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424405</link>
    <description>The Tribunal consistently ruled in favor of the assessee for assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11, emphasizing the necessity of clear penalty notices. Penalties were deleted as the notices were ambiguous and did not specify the basis for imposition, aligning with the Tribunal&#039;s decisions nullifying specific additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:36:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1246 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424405</link>
      <description>The Tribunal consistently ruled in favor of the assessee for assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11, emphasizing the necessity of clear penalty notices. Penalties were deleted as the notices were ambiguous and did not specify the basis for imposition, aligning with the Tribunal&#039;s decisions nullifying specific additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>