<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1233 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424392</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the order of Ld. CIT(A), upholding the deletion of the penalty u/s 271D imposed on the assessee for alleged violations of section 269SS. The tribunal found the transactions genuine, made in the normal course of business, without any intent to evade tax. Citing judicial precedents, including CIT vs Triumph International Finance, it concluded that the penalty was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 22:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1233 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424392</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the order of Ld. CIT(A), upholding the deletion of the penalty u/s 271D imposed on the assessee for alleged violations of section 269SS. The tribunal found the transactions genuine, made in the normal course of business, without any intent to evade tax. Citing judicial precedents, including CIT vs Triumph International Finance, it concluded that the penalty was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>