<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1228 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424387</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal by the Customs and Service Tax Excise Appellate Tribunal due to non-compliance with the mandatory deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal lacked authority to waive or reduce the pre-deposit amount, citing the statutory provisions and previous judgments. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments and references to cases with waived pre-deposit requirements, the Court affirmed the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and dismissed the appeal, highlighting the need for compliance with legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1228 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424387</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal by the Customs and Service Tax Excise Appellate Tribunal due to non-compliance with the mandatory deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal lacked authority to waive or reduce the pre-deposit amount, citing the statutory provisions and previous judgments. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments and references to cases with waived pre-deposit requirements, the Court affirmed the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and dismissed the appeal, highlighting the need for compliance with legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>