<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Act Section 112(a) Penalty: No Evidence of Awareness in Country of Origin Mis-declaration by Re-importer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64326</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Allegation of evasion of anti-dumping duty - joint liability with rea-importer - mis-declaring the country of origin as Malaysia, instead of China - There is no evidence to show that at the time of imports he was aware that goods were allegedly being mis-declared by Nalin Mehta to customs. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:34:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:34:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Act Section 112(a) Penalty: No Evidence of Awareness in Country of Origin Mis-declaration by Re-importer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64326</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Allegation of evasion of anti-dumping duty - joint liability with rea-importer - mis-declaring the country of origin as Malaysia, instead of China - There is no evidence to show that at the time of imports he was aware that goods were allegedly being mis-declared by Nalin Mehta to customs. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:34:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>