<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1210 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424369</link>
    <description>Bread-rusk was classified under the specific entry for bread rather than the residuary taxable entry under the Himachal Pradesh VAT regime. The Court applied the principle that a residuary entry is a last resort and that a specific description prevails where the product answers it. Using the common parlance and essential-character approach, it noted that bread and rusk share the same raw material and manufacturing process, with the difference confined to baking and moisture content. The revenue failed to discharge the burden of showing that bread-rusk could not fall within the bread entry, so VAT on the residuary basis was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1210 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424369</link>
      <description>Bread-rusk was classified under the specific entry for bread rather than the residuary taxable entry under the Himachal Pradesh VAT regime. The Court applied the principle that a residuary entry is a last resort and that a specific description prevails where the product answers it. Using the common parlance and essential-character approach, it noted that bread and rusk share the same raw material and manufacturing process, with the difference confined to baking and moisture content. The revenue failed to discharge the burden of showing that bread-rusk could not fall within the bread entry, so VAT on the residuary basis was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>